Table of Contents

Research Handbook on the Future of EU Copyright

Research Handbook on the Future of EU Copyright

Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property series

Edited by Estelle Derclaye

It has been over fifteen years since the EU started harmonising copyright law. This original Handbook takes stock and questions what the future of EU copyright should be. What went wrong with the harmonisation acquis? What did the directives do well? Should copyright be further harmonised? Each of the 25 recognised copyright experts from different European countries gives a critical account of the EU harmonisation carried out on several aspects of copyright law (subject-matter, originality, duration, rights, defences etc.), and asks whether further harmonisation is desirable or not. This way, the Handbook not only gives guidance to European institutions as to what remains to be done or needs to be remedied but is also the first overall picture of current and future EU copyright law.

Chapter 6: From Idea to Fixation: A View of Protected Works

Antoine Latreille

Subjects: law - academic, intellectual property law


5 The requirement of originality Ramón Casas Vallés 1. Introduction The requirement of originality is common in copyright. Overarching, sine qua non, essence of copyright, touchstone, cornerstone etc. these are terms often used by specialists. It is understandable, originality being the criterion or concept that normally defines the borders of this institution, both internally (to distinguish copyright from neighbouring rights – where admitted) and externally (to distinguish it from other forms of protection – proprietary or not – of intangible goods). It is also used to establish the degree of protection, albeit this may cause some problems to the extent that it implies fragmenting a regime which is theoretically envisioned as unitary, hence without granting more or fewer rights depending on the degree of originality. In any case, both the law and the case law agree to grant it a decisive role. Originality is the evidence and materialization of authorship and what justifies the granting of copyright. Paraphrasing Plato’s Academy motto ‘Let no one ignorant of geometry enter here’, the threshold of Copyright’s citadel could read: ‘Let nothing non-original enter here’ . . . although originality, like geometry, can be ultimately variable. The central role assigned to the requirement of originality does not correspond to the doubts it generates. This is a striking and uncomfortable issue. On the other hand, courts have been relatively at ease when dealing with this requirement, under the interpretative latitude afforded by imprecise legal terms. For judges – and others – the difficulty is not deciding but rather explaining it. To...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information