Table of Contents

Environmental Governance and Decentralisation

Environmental Governance and Decentralisation

New Horizons in Environmental Economics series

Edited by Albert Breton, Giorgio Brosio, Silvana Dalmazzone and Giovanna Garrone

This book examines how different countries define and address environmental issues, specifically in relation to intergovernmental relations: the creation of institutions, the assignment of powers, and the success of alternative solutions. It also investigates whether a systemic view of the environment has influenced the policy-making process. The broad perspective adopted includes a detailed analysis of seventeen countries in six continents by scholars from a range of disciplines – economics, political science, environmental science and law – thus producing novel material that moves away from the conventional treatment of decentralisation and the environment in economic literature.

Chapter 3: Economic Growth and Environmental Protection in Brazil: An Unfavourable Trade-off

Clóvis Cavalcanti

Subjects: economics and finance, environmental economics, public sector economics, environment, environmental economics, environmental governance and regulation


3. Economic growth and environmental protection in Brazil: An unfavourable trade-off Clóvis Cavalcanti 1. INTRODUCTION A characteristic of Brazil’s history over the last 500 years1 is that it has produced a succession of actions with huge negative environmental implications (Viola, 1987; Cavalcanti, 1991). The present picture conveys a sense of the irresponsibility with which the natural resources of the country have been systematically exploited since the conquest. Moreover, it also exhibits instances of many of the same evils which afflict ecosystems throughout the world – slash-and-burn agriculture, soil degradation (recently accelerated by the expansion of the cultivation of soyabeans in Amazonia, preceded by deforestation and logging), contaminated water, and so on. In the Brazilian case, the problem is aggravated by the ‘pollution of misery’ and a very unequal income distribution. These problems, by the way, were presented in the Stockholm UN Conference (1972) as arguments justifying more pollution of the conventional type (Viola, 1987: 83–4). The military who ruled the country at that time, and had a nationalist project of development, justified the need for polluting industries to move to Brazil on grounds that, although they polluted, they also raised the prospects of rapid growth. The international press and the literature on environmental issues do not exaggerate when they offer dramatic information about the relationship between Brazil and its ecology. This has been especially true in the last decades with problems such as those we have witnessed in the Amazon. Frontier expansion in that unique region...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information