International Handbook of Urban Policy, Volume 2

International Handbook of Urban Policy, Volume 2

Issues in the Developed World

Elgar original reference

Edited by H. S. Geyer

This Handbook brings together a range of viewpoints on a number of the burning issues affecting urban sustainability in North America and Europe at the beginning of the 21st century. H.S. Geyer and his contributors cover a wide spectrum of the urban policy issues that determine the growth and development progress as well as the livability of cities in the Occident.

Chapter 7: The Continuing Urban Form Controversy: Towards Bridging the Divide

H.S. Geyer

Subjects: politics and public policy, public policy, urban and regional studies, urban studies

Extract

H.S. Geyer Introduction A large body of research has developed over the years arguing for and against urban sprawl (see STPP, 1997; Smart Growth, 2008; Audirac and Zifou, 1989), but differences of opinion about the relationship between urban form and sustainability and whether urban densification or market-driven urban development is the preferred way forward have not diminished. Opposing positions in this debate are as passionately defended now as they were in the mid-1990s when Jenks et al. (1996, p. 11) called it ‘one of the most hotly debated issues on the international environmental agenda’. Questions about the way in which cities should be developed to reduce resource depletion and improve social and economic sustainability are still as central to this debate now as they were a decade ago. In many respects, global climate change has made the issue even more pertinent. Daily one would be bombarded by the media with references about global warming and its possible effects on human life or vice versa. For some time now the compact city idea has been widely propagated as the only responsible urban form in the wake of global climate change while sprawl has been singled out as bad – a major contributor to global warming (Congress of New Urbanism Charter, 2008; Smart Growth, 2008; Tyler, 2005; Darby, 2007; Ellis, 2002; European Commission, 2006; Hickman and Banister, 2007; and many others). This view is advanced by an energetic and vocal group within the international academic fraternity through all possible forums and media outlets...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information