Table of Contents

Flexibility and Employment Security in Europe

Flexibility and Employment Security in Europe

Labour Markets in Transition

Edited by Ruud Muffels

This book seeks to gain a better understanding of the paradoxical relationship between the alleged need of European labour markets to become more flexible and the way in which national policies pursue this aim without jeopardising existing high standards of income and employment security. Special interest is devoted to the way in which countries opt for different policy routes to cope with the aim of balancing flexibility and security goals in their respective labour market and social protection policies. The contributions in this book all try to unveil the particular changes or transitions occurring in the various labour markets, to learn about their medium and longer term effects and the role of institutions and policies to cushion the adverse consequences of these changes. By studying some ‘best practices’ in Denmark, Canada and Australia they also draw some important lessons about the reasons why national policies might either fail or better cope with the challenges Europe face today.

Chapter 4: Dreaming of a Permanent Job: The Transitions of Temporary Workers in Italy and Spain

Virginia Hernanz, Federica Origo, Manuela Samek Lodovici and Luis Toharia

Subjects: economics and finance, labour economics, social policy and sociology, comparative social policy, labour policy


Virginia Hernanz, Federica Origo, Manuela Samek Lodovici and Luis Toharia 4.1 INTRODUCTION Recent decades have witnessed a significant increase in the flexibility of most European labour markets. In this context, external flexibility has mainly been exercised through the use of temporary or fixed-term1 employment contracts (OECD, 1999). In 2003, almost 13 per cent of all employees in the EU was employed in flexible contracts, ranging from 6 per cent in the UK to more than 30 per cent in Spain, with the figure for Italy being just below 10 per cent (European Commission, 2004). Public support for temporary employment schemes has been driven by their potential for increasing employability and lowering the risk of long-term unemployment. Temporary work should in fact help the unemployed to regain employment and preserve or improve their human capital through work experience, thus reducing the number and duration of unemployment spells that individuals experience while enhancing their probability of finding better (permanent) jobs. Empirical evidence also seems to suggest that employers may use temporary contracts as a way to select and screen future permanent employees (Storrie, 2002; Houseman and Osawa, 2003). However, it has been argued that the positive effects of temporary employment systems may be offset by costs related to the poor quality of temporary jobs and the limited career opportunities of temporary workers. As far as temporary jobs are characterised by lower wages and impaired working conditions, they signal the consequences of dual labour markets arising from the expansion of temporary work (Lindbeck...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information