Pension Fund Governance

Pension Fund Governance

A Global Perspective on Financial Regulation

Edited by John Evans, Michael Orszag and John Piggott

The academic literature on pension governance is sparse and this book will fill some important gaps by bringing together original contributions from around the world on subjects related to the area. The book initially lays out the main frameworks for pension fund governance and then goes on to examine global governance practice and experience and country studies on pension funds in the United States and Australia. The final section of this in-depth study discusses the role of government guarantees.

Chapter 8: Public Sector Pension Governance, Funding and Performance: A Longitudinal Appraisal

Tongxuan (Stella) Yang and Olivia S. Mitchell

Subjects: economics and finance, financial economics and regulation, welfare economics


Tongxuan (Stella) Yang and Olivia S. Mitchell* Public pension plans are the mainstay of retirement security for millions of public sector employees around the world. In the United States, these plans have traditionally been of the defined benefit variety, holding around US$3 trillion in assets (Ilkiw 2003) and covering a range of state and local civil servants, teachers and university professors, and uniformed workers (firefighters, police). Although these pensions play a key role in US labour and capital markets, they are experiencing serious funding problems due to their assets standing well below the levels needed to cover the promised benefits. According to Bonafede, Foresti and Dashtara (2007), 80 per cent of the 64 state retirement systems that reported actuarial data for 2006 were underfunded, with the average underfunded plan having an assets-to-liabilities ratio equal to 79 per cent. Of the 108 state retirement systems that reported actuarial data for 2005, 84 per cent were underfunded, with the average underfunded plan having an assetsto-liabilities ratio equal to 82 per cent.1 A large number of stakeholders stand to lose if public pension funding ratios sink, including retirees, who may suffer benefit cuts, and taxpayers, who may have to pay for the underfinanced benefit claims.2 Such pension liabilities may also reduce the ability of governments to attract and retain high-quality employees,3 influence the credit ratings of pension plans and potentially increase the risk premiums for public debt.4 Traditionally, US public pension plans have differed from their corporate counterparts in that they...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information