Pension Fund Governance

Pension Fund Governance

A Global Perspective on Financial Regulation

Edited by John Evans, Michael Orszag and John Piggott

The academic literature on pension governance is sparse and this book will fill some important gaps by bringing together original contributions from around the world on subjects related to the area. The book initially lays out the main frameworks for pension fund governance and then goes on to examine global governance practice and experience and country studies on pension funds in the United States and Australia. The final section of this in-depth study discusses the role of government guarantees.

Chapter 10: Pricing Defined Benefit Pension Insurance

David McCarthy and Anthony Neuberger

Subjects: economics and finance, financial economics and regulation, welfare economics


David McCarthy and Anthony Neuberger 1. PENSION GUARANTEE FUNDS Concern about the security of occupational defined benefit pensions when sponsoring firms default on them has led to the establishment of pension guarantee funds in several countries. The largest and best established exemplar of a guarantee fund is the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) of the United States, which was introduced with the passage of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) in 1974 following some highly publicized pension defaults. The United Kingdom followed suit in 2004, when public concern about the security of defined benefit pensions led to the establishment of the Pension Protection Fund (PPF), which was largely modelled on the PBGC. The purpose of this chapter is to identify and quantify some of the main policy issues involved in the establishment and management of pension guarantee funds.1 One key issue is the solvency of these funds, and possible claims on the public purse. For instance, after a run of years of very low claims—claims averaged US$300 million per year over the period 1980–99—the PBGC faced very large claims in the period 2000–04, amounting to some US$21 billion in total. Its 2004 accounts show a deficit of US$23.3 billion, after probable claims from currently insured plans are taken into account. The total underfunding of US pension plans covered by the PBGC increased from less than US$30 billion in 1999 to more than US$450 billion in 2004, as a result of...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information