Table of Contents

Competition Law and Patents

Competition Law and Patents

A Follow-on Innovation Perspective in the Biopharmaceutical Industry

New Horizons in Competition Law and Economics series

Irina Haracoglou

Using the example of research tools in biopharmaceutical research and innovation, this book examines the complexities of the relationship between two fundamental areas of law and policy – intellectual property rights and competition law. It addresses a question that is certain to become paramount in other industries also: how to strike the balance between initial and follow-on innovation so as to ensure that access to ‘essential’ research tools (or other fundamental elements to follow-on innovation) is not impeded. The book concludes by suggesting how competition law could be used to complement the patent balance.

Chapter 5: Unilateral Conduct, Intellectual Property Rights and Competition Law: A Systems’ Interaction

Irina Haracoglou

Subjects: economics and finance, competition policy, law - academic, biotechnology and pharmaceutical law, competition and antitrust law, intellectual property law


5.1 Introduction The relationship between intellectual property (IP) and competition is a controversial subject. Whilst both share a common objective, namely, the enhancement of consumer welfare and promoting innovation, some problems arise as they operate in different ways. Antitrust seeks to achieve the object of maximising allocative and productive efficiency by preventing monopolistic output reduction and unlawful restrictions on competition, whilst intellectual property rights (IPRs) endeavour to achieve the same result by providing a legal monopoly as an incentive for innovation and for the manufacture of new and cheaper products. ‘In the short run consumers are supplied with an additional choice, albeit at a monopoly price; and in the long run when the patent expires, the industry as a whole can produce more and at lower cost.’ Hence, while the relationship between IP and competition is no longer perceived as inherently conflictual, and the possible pro-competitive role of IPRs has been recognised, at least for long-term competition, there are still cases where EC competition law will intervene if it is perceived that the shortterm impact on competition outweighs the long-term efficiencies. This is usually the case where the patent holder is able to extend his legal monopoly beyond the statutory grant, often to overlap with an economic monopoly, or to pursue aims against the letter and the spirit of the EU competition provisions. Allocative efficiency presupposes that the price mechanism will ensure that producers produce what the consumers want, and productive efficiency presupposes that competition from other producers will produce...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information