International Trade and Health Protection

International Trade and Health Protection

A Critical Assessment of the WTO’s SPS Agreement

Elgar International Economic Law series

Tracey Epps

This book examines and critiques the WTO’s Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS Agreement), asking whether it strikes an appropriate balance between conflicting domestic health protection and trade liberalization objectives.

Chapter 8: Setting the Standards: Home or Away?

Tracey Epps

Subjects: law - academic, human rights, international economic law, trade law, politics and public policy, human rights


8.1 INTRODUCTION The Uruguay Round Agreements extended the reach of international trade law into areas that had previously been seen as the exclusive domain of domestic governments, including regulatory decision-making in matters of health protection. As discussed, the SPS Agreement asks countries to regulate in a way that reduces the incidence and potentially distortive effects of non-tariff trade barriers. Inevitably therefore, its application impinges to a certain extent on state sovereignty. Questions of interpretation of the SPS Agreement raise questions about the appropriate extent of this infringement. In and of itself, the concept of sovereignty – being a reference to political control over a given territory – provides little guidance to interpretation of the SPS Agreement beyond the observation that health protection is at the heart of a nation’s sovereign powers. We might accept that becoming part of the international trading regime necessitates a certain level of infringement, but how do we judge when that infringement becomes too great? It is in this regard that the principle of subsidiarity may prove helpful as a way of thinking about what is the most appropriate institutional setting in which to tackle the policy- and rule-making challenges arising from the growing commercial interdependence of nations.1 This chapter will introduce the principle of subsidiarity as a conceptual tool to help us think not only about where decisions about health risks are most appropriately made but also what standard of review might be appropriate when WTO panels and the Appellate Body are called upon to examine a...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information