China, India and Beyond

China, India and Beyond

Development Drivers and Limitations

Global Development Network series

Edited by Natalia Dinello and Shaoguang Wang

China, India and Beyond challenges the widespread belief that China and India will be the driving forces of the global economy in the 21st century. Scholars of these two countries offer scenarios ranging from buoyant to subdued to negative, depending on how they evaluate the drivers of development (market-oriented reforms, global integration and investment in human capital), and its limitations (infrastructure bottlenecks, environmental degradation and institutional frailties). The book covers a broad set of topics, including international trade and investment, health care and grassroots democracy. Readers from all countries will benefit from this cogent analysis of the delicate balance among various ingredients of successful development versus failure.

Chapter 4: Specialization Patterns under Trade Liberalization: Evidence from India and China

Choorikkadan Veeramani

Subjects: asian studies, asian development, development studies, asian development, development economics, economics and finance, development economics


Choorikkadan Veeramani India and China, like many developing countries, have rejected development strategies based on import substitution in favor of international openness. China started the trade liberalization process in earnest in 1978, while India introduced ‘cautious liberalization’ during the 1980s, focusing on internal deregulation rather than on trade liberalization. Until 1991 India’s trade regime was considered one of the most restrictive in the world, due to its complexity and the wide number of tools used as policy instruments. The most pronounced overhaul of India’s trade policy regime occurred during the early 1990s in response to a severe balance of payments crisis. The domestic firms in India and China which had been operating under protective umbrellas were forced to respond to the competitive pressures from imports. Decision makers hoped that the policy changes would improve export competitiveness through efficient resource allocation, greater specialization, diffusion of international knowledge and heightened competition. The commodity structure of the country’s trade is also expected to undergo changes. The conventional wisdom is that competition will induce a process of resource reallocation from the import-competing industries to those industries where the country has comparative advantages. It follows that a natural consequence of trade liberalization is the expansion of inter-industry trade – that is, exports increase in one set of industries, while imports increase in another. Further, trade liberalization invariably involves adjustment costs, as some domestic industries may go out of business. However, many studies suggest that trade liberalization biases a country’s trade expansion toward intra-industry trade rather than...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information