Handbook of Research on Stock Market Globalization

Handbook of Research on Stock Market Globalization

Elgar original reference

Edited by Geoffrey Poitras

The stock market globalization process has produced historic changes in the structure of stock markets, the effects of which are evident throughout the world. Despite these transformations, there are relatively few sources examining the connections between the globalization process currently under way and previous periods of stock market globalization. This seminal volume fills that gap.

Chapter 11: What Happened on 6 May 2010? Anatomy of the Flash Crash

Geoffrey Poitras

Subjects: economics and finance, economic psychology, financial economics and regulation, money and banking


Geoffrey Poitras [R]emarkably fast-growing IT-driven ECNs, MTFs, and other off-exchange trading facilities are giving rise to noticeable issues such as market fragmentation, regulatory discrepancies between markets and free-riding on the self-regulatory functions of incumbent exchanges in the EU and US. In the near future, this trend is also likely to affect Japanese stock markets. The ‘flash crash’ that occurred in the US in May 2010 is an example of a phenomenon arising from these factors. (Atsushi Saito, President and Chief Executive Officer, Tokyo Stock Exchange Group) Despite being a key element in capitalist society, much activity in the stock market happens outside the glare of public scrutiny. In turn, regulation of the stock market is predominantly civil, with criminal sanctions reserved only for the most egregious actions. In the US, the federal stock market regulator, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), is only empowered to impose civil penalties. Criminal prosecution falls within the purview of the Justice Department. Similarly, important instances of historical regulation, such as the seventeenth-century Dutch ban on in blanco short selling or the eighteenth-century English ban on trading of privileges (see Poitras, Chapter 3 in this volume), did not involve criminal sanction. Rather, legislation removed the protection of the courts for those involved in such trading. Despite various bans and restrictions, ‘prohibited’ trading continued. Where sanctions associated with trading restrictions are particularly prohibitive, then trading shifts to alternative jurisdictions, for example hedge funds domiciled in overshore tax havens use a master–feeder fund structure to...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information