Antitrust and Regulation in the EU and US

Antitrust and Regulation in the EU and US

Legal and Economic Perspectives

New Horizons in Competition Law and Economics series

Edited by François Lévêque and Howard Shelanski

The diverse and excellent set of authors assembled in this book sheds light on the continuing and conflicting calls for deregulation and re-regulation of important industries and informs the ongoing, increasingly global, policy debate over the evolving line between regulation and general competition policy. The purpose of this book is to understand the debate and its policy implications, focusing on the traditionally regulated sectors of telecommunications and energy, and comparing approaches in the European Union and the United States.

Chapter 5: Rethinking Merger Remedies: Toward a Harmonization of Regulatory Oversight with Antitrust Merger Review

Philip J. Weiser

Subjects: economics and finance, competition policy, law and economics, law - academic, competition and antitrust law, law and economics


Philip J. Weiser* The debate concerning merger review in regulated industries often starts with the claim that regulatory agencies provide little or no added benefit to the review conducted by competition authorities. In the US telecommunications context, Harold Furchtgott-Roth, a former Commissioner on the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), has called for an end to regulatory oversight of mergers between telecommunications providers, developing his critique in a number of his separate statements while he served on the Commission and, most recently, in testimony to the US Antitrust Modernization Commission (Furchtgott-Roth, 2005). In so doing, he amplified the criticism offered by a number of commentators, former FCC officials, and practitioners, all of whom bemoan the FCC’s lack of a clear competition policy standard, penchant for imposing conditions unrelated to the merger itself, and tendency to delay the ultimate approval of the transaction (Barkow and Huber 2000; Tramont 2000; Russell and Wolson 2002). Over the last decade, the FCC has vacillated in its approach to merger review. One constant is that, except for the very rare case, it does not bar two firms from merging on competition policy grounds (FCC 2002). Rather, it generally imposes conditions on the merger. In the worst of cases, the agency, as former Chairman Powell once criticized, “places harm on one side of the scale and then collects and places any hodgepodge of conditions no matter how ill-suited to remedying the identified infirmities on the other side of the scale” (FCC 1999, p. 15 197). In the best...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information