Table of Contents

The Law and Economics of Class Actions in Europe

The Law and Economics of Class Actions in Europe

Lessons from America

New Horizons in Law and Economics series

Edited by Jürgen G. Backhaus, Alberto Cassone and Giovanni B. Ramello

This well-documented book discusses the power and limitations of class actions with insights and analysis from a panel of distinguished scholars. It pays special attention to the introduction and the applicability of such a legal device in European civil law countries. The book offers a broad legal and economic investigation, drawing insights from US judicial experience and giving a rigorous discussion of both the philosophical and constitutional aspects and the economic mechanisms and incentives set up by class actions.

Chapter 6: The Economics of Class Action Litigation

Thomas S. Ulen

Subjects: economics and finance, law and economics, law - academic, european law, law and economics


Thomas S. Ulen1 1. INTRODUCTION The United States is almost unique in many aspects of its legal system – for example, in allowing contingent fee contracts between lawyers and clients and in making legal education exclusively graduate education, in using juries in civil disputes, and allowing class action litigation. This last practice – facilitating and regulating the consolidation of numerous similar lawsuits into a single action – is practiced elsewhere, but it has reached its most extensive use in the highly competitive U.S. legal market. The principal argument in favor of class action litigation is straightforward: it is likely to be more efficient to litigate the same general complaint once rather than to do so in a series – perhaps a large number – of similar complaints. To put the matter in economic parlance, there are likely to be economies of scale for both plaintiffs and defendant or defendants in having one large trial than in having individual trials. However compelling this simple argument in favor of class action litigation may be, the practice of class action litigation in the modern United States’ legal system has not commanded universal approval. While there are those who see it as a socially beneficial practice that allows, for example, appropriate redress to small claimants against major corporations, there are those who see class action litigation as socially costly in that it fosters frivolous litigation that threatens to erode business confidence and competitiveness. The public debate between these opposing views has been 1 I owe great thanks to Amber...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information