The Elgar Companion to Hyman Minsky

The Elgar Companion to Hyman Minsky

Elgar original reference

Edited by Dimitri B. Papadimitriou and L. Randall Wray

This Companion provides a timely and engaging treatment of Hyman Minsky’s approach to economics, which is enjoying a renewed appreciation because of its prescient analysis of the slow but sure transformation of the capitalist economy in the post-war period. Many have called the global financial crisis that began in the United States in 2007 a ‘Minsky crisis’, and these original contributions demonstrate precisely why both academic economists as well as policymakers have turned to Minsky for guidance. The book brings together the foremost Minsky scholars to provide a comprehensive overview of his approach, with extensions to bring the analysis up to date.

Chapter 3: Minsky and Economic Policy: ‘Keynesianism’ All Over Again?

Éric Tymoigne

Subjects: economics and finance, history of economic thought


Éric Tymoigne Introduction1 Minsky’s analysis led him to conclude that there are different forms of capitalism each with pros and cons. Laissez-faire capitalism, where the government represents an insignificant proportion of the economy, promotes individual initiatives and creativity (what one may call entrepreneurship) but also generates depressions and unfair inequalities. On the contrary, big-government capitalism is more stable but also comes with its own problems like a lack of dynamism and inflationary tendencies. Following Keynes, Minsky stated that unfair distribution, economic instability and unemployment were structural problems of market mechanisms, and so he promoted a form of capitalism that significantly involves the government. Many economists would associate Minsky’s view with the Neoclassical Synthesis of the 1950s and 1960s, also known as ‘Keynesianism,’ when monetary and fiscal discretions were used to fine-tune the economy. In this case, most economists would brush away Minsky’s proposal for the same reasons they rejected Keynesianism in the 1970s: lack of rationality (Lucas’s critique), ignorance of credibility and reputation, and lack of consideration for lags and structural barriers to low unemployment. However, Minsky was careful to note that there are different forms of big-government capitalism and that not all forms of government activism are consistent with Keynes’s policy agenda. The Bastard Keynesianism of the mid-20th century, to take Joan Robinson’s colorful characterization, tends to generate arbitrary inequalities, inflationary pressures and longterm unemployment by creating strong income disincentives to reenter the labor force and to hire, by not dealing properly with the chronic shortage of jobs...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information