The Elgar Companion to Hyman Minsky

The Elgar Companion to Hyman Minsky

Elgar original reference

Edited by Dimitri B. Papadimitriou and L. Randall Wray

This Companion provides a timely and engaging treatment of Hyman Minsky’s approach to economics, which is enjoying a renewed appreciation because of its prescient analysis of the slow but sure transformation of the capitalist economy in the post-war period. Many have called the global financial crisis that began in the United States in 2007 a ‘Minsky crisis’, and these original contributions demonstrate precisely why both academic economists as well as policymakers have turned to Minsky for guidance. The book brings together the foremost Minsky scholars to provide a comprehensive overview of his approach, with extensions to bring the analysis up to date.

Chapter 8: Innovation and Equilibrium?

Martin Shubik

Subjects: economics and finance, history of economic thought


Martin Shubik Introduction This chapter is written in fond memory of Hyman Minsky whose writings on the possibilities for instability in a modern economy with many financial institutions have had considerable influence on the way economists view the strengths and weaknesses of our increasingly finance oriented economies (see Minsky 1986). Hy had a considerable skepticism about the uses and abuses of mathematical economic theory, especially general equilibrium theory’s emphasis on equilibrium. His skepticism has been shared by many macroeconomists of both left and right persuasion. Starting as far back as Schumpeter in the early part of the twentieth century a provocative picture of the capitalist innovating economy was painted. Although the proponents of Schumpeter’s approach have grown considerably over the last twenty to thirty years, primarily in Europe (see, for example, Nelson and Winter 1982 and Dosi et al. 1988), so, since the late 1950s, have the general equilibrium theorists. The thesis presented here is that the reconciliation of equilibrium microeconomics and disequilibrium financial economics and macroeconomics is both feasible and depends far less on correcting errors or misperceptions in either than on understanding the highly different questions being answered by each; and identifying the gaps in the models utilized by both that need to be filled if a reconciliation is to take place. Keynes described and dealt with disequilibrium. Jim Tobin regarded the overall macroeconomic system as having a general equilibrium structure but with many changing parameters that needed to be reestimated frequently. Lejonhufvud, Davidson and many others have...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information