Global Business and the Terrorist Threat

Global Business and the Terrorist Threat

Edited by Harry W. Richardson, Peter Gordon and James E. Moore II

Global business is affected by global terrorism and the two are intricately linked on many levels. This book is an eclectic and enlightening compendium of research that explores the interrelationships between the two. A companion to and expansion on the authors’ previous books on the area, Global Business and the Terrorist Threat takes a closer look at practical business management, as influenced by terrorist infrastructure, networks and actions.

Chapter 12: The Economic Impacts of International Border Closure: A State-by-State Analysis

Harry W. Richardson, Peter Gordon, James E. Moore II and Jiyoung Park

Subjects: business and management, international business, public management, politics and public policy, public administration and management, public policy, terrorism and security


Peter Gordon, James E. Moore II, Jiyoung Park and Harry W. Richardson INTRODUCTION Recurrent reminders that an international avian influenza epidemic is a real possibility have prompted a variety of public policy discussions. A recent World Bank study estimated that the global economy would lose $2 trillion from an outbreak, or 3 percent of world gross domestic product (GDP). Another report in the Lancet (by the Harvard Initiative for Global Health Group – see Murray et al., 2006), largely based on an analogy drawn from the Spanish flu epidemic of 1918–20, presented various estimates of possible US fatalities. These included a low threshold of 114,483, a median threshold of 297,883, a mean threshold of 383,881 and a high threshold of 744,226. Applying the US Environmental Protection Agency’s valuation of a statistical life, $5.8 million, these fatalities amount to large imputed dollar amounts: $664 billion, $1.728 trillion, $2.227 trillion and $4.317 trillion, respectively. These estimates, astronomical though they are, ignore the treatment costs of those who get sick but do not die, quarantine costs, and other disaster management costs.1 While the Lancet study argues that a future pandemic might be even worse than in 1918–20, it also accepts that fatalities might be lower because of improved medical management (although the health care system could be overwhelmed), anti-virals, quarantine and vaccination. Yet, it is probably safe to say that terrorists with an admitted interest in acquiring and using weapons of mass destruction have taken note of these...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information