Research Handbook of Comparative Employment Relations

Research Handbook of Comparative Employment Relations

New Horizons in Management series

Edited by Michael Barry and Adrian Wilkinson

The Research Handbook of Comparative Employment Relations is an essential resource for those seeking to understand contemporary developments in the world of work, and the way in which employment relations systems are evolving around the world.

Chapter 10: Employment Relations in Japan and Korea

EeHwan Jung

Subjects: business and management, human resource management, organisational behaviour, social policy and sociology, labour policy

Extract

EeHwan Jung INTRODUCTION It has been generally believed that employment relations in Japan and Korea are quite different. Until the 1980s, comparing Japan’s and Korea’s employment relations was regarded almost as nonsense, as Korea’s industrial relations under successive authoritarian regimes were not fully developed, while Japan had well-developed industrial relations. Korea’s employment relations were compared more often with those of other developing countries such as East Asian NICs (newly industrialized countries) that failed to build democratic industrial relations (Deyo, 1989, 1997). In particular, Korea was often compared with Taiwan, as the two countries belonged to the same phase of economic development (Bamber and Ross, 2000; Kong, 2005). Even after political democratization and the growth of the labor movement in Korea, differences rather than similarities have been stressed in comparing employment relations in Japan and Korea. More than anything, industrial relations in Korea have been much more adversarial than in Japan. Whitley (1999, p. 202) anticipated that the Japanese level of employer–employee interdependence and commitment was unlikely to become institutionalized in Korea in the near future. Indeed, it does not seem to make sense to argue that Korea’s employment relations system is a variant of the Japanese model. It is also true, however, that employment relations in Japan and Korea share many similarities. If we agree to the common view that lifetime employment, seniority pay and enterprise unionism are three pillars of employment relations in Japan (OECD, 1973), Korea also has at least two of these pillars. Unions are enterprise-based...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information