Table of Contents

Research Handbook on Environment, Health and the WTO

Research Handbook on Environment, Health and the WTO

Research Handbooks on the WTO series

Edited by Geert Van Calster and Denise Prévost

This Handbook provides state-of-the-art analysis by leading authors on the links between the international trade regime and health and environment concerns – concerns that make up an increasing proportion of WTO dispute settlement. Research Handbook on Environment, Health and the WTO surveys fields as diverse as climate change mitigation, non-communicable diseases, nanotechnology and public health care. The volume brings to the fore the debates and complexities surrounding these issues and their implications for the international trading system.

Chapter 10: Pre-market approval systems and the SPS Agreement

Tracey Epps

Subjects: environment, environmental law, law - academic, environmental law, health law, international economic law, trade law

Extract

Food safety is a key policy concern for many governments and their citizens and its importance is only heightened by the ever increasing flow of goods across international borders. As countries seek to ensure the safety of their food supply, trade friction may arise where measures are taken to restrict or otherwise control imports of food stuffs. The imposition of trade restrictions to ensure the safety of food and protect public health has long been recognised by international trade rules as a necessary, although qualified, limitation on trade. The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT ) in Article XX(b) allows Members to enact measures that violate the substantive obligations of the Agreement if they are “necessary to protect human, animal and plant life and health”, so long as they are not “applied in a manner which would constitute arbitrary or unjustifiable discrimination between countries where the same conditions prevail, or a disguised restriction on international trade”. This provision was negotiated in the 1940s and by the late 1980s, countries recognised that despite the qualifier as to how measures must be applied, there was still room for countries to enact protectionist measures in the name of health. Not only was it perceived that there was room to manouevre around the rules, but many considered that countries were particularly likely to do so in the area of food stuffs where they often face significant domestic political pressure to protect their agricultural sectors.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information