Table of Contents

Climate Change and European Emissions Trading

Climate Change and European Emissions Trading

Lessons for Theory and Practice

New Horizons in Environmental and Energy Law series

Edited by Michael Faure and Marjan Peeters

This timely book focuses on the EU-wide greenhouse gas emissions trading scheme for major sources. It combines legal and economic approaches and reviews the major revision of this scheme. A distinguished range of authors assess the experiences thus far and also consider future development from both theoretical and practical perspectives. They also discuss many design options, including auctioning, credit and trade, the inclusion of aviation emissions, and linking possibilities. Moreover, attention is paid to the role of legal principles, the role of case law, and to aspects of democratic accountability within an emissions trading scheme. Ways to avoid carbon leakage and the role of national climate policies are also discussed. This book makes clear that the economic efficiency and effectiveness of an emissions trading scheme depend to a large extent on the specific legislative choices, and hence the legislative design of such a scheme deserves meticulous attention.

Chapter 3: Too Much Harmonization? An Analysis of the Commission’s Proposal to Amend the EU ETS from the Perspective of Legal Principles

Javier De Cendra De Larragán

Subjects: environment, environmental law, law - academic, environmental law


Javier De Cendra De Larragán1 1. INTRODUCTION The EU has adopted a strong political stance towards climate change. In recent years it has taken a number of important steps in an attempt to develop a comprehensive climate change policy,2 at which core lay the EU burdensharing agreement established by Council Decision 2002/358/EC3 and the emissions trading scheme (EU ETS) established by Directive 2003/87/EC4 (hereafter Directive 2003/87/EC or the directive). The latter directive covers the key elements of the EU ETS, including the basic rules for the allocation of allowances. However it adopts a highly decentralized approach, affording Member States a significant leeway to make important regulatory choices. This decentralized approach has seemingly brought numerous problems, reducing the capacity of the EU ETS to achieve the main objectives of the directive, namely environmental effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and economic efficiency, and the sound functioning of the internal market by avoiding distortions of competition.5 Article 30 of the directive mandates the 1 2 Ph.D Researcher, METRO, University of Maastricht. However, EU climate change policy cannot be considered to be comprehensive yet. See Ludwig Kramer, ‘Some reflections on the EU mix of instruments on climate change’, in Peeters and Deketelaere (2006). 3 Council Decision 2002/358/EC concerning the approval, on behalf of the European Community, of the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the joint fulfilment of commitments thereunder, OJ L 130, 15.5.2002, p.1. 4 Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a scheme...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information