Property Rights, Consumption and the Market Process

Property Rights, Consumption and the Market Process

New Horizons in Institutional and Evolutionary Economics series

David Emanuel Andersson

Property Rights, Consumption and the Market Process extends property rights theory in new and exciting directions by combining complementary insights from Austrian, institutional and evolutionary economics. Mainstream economics tends to analyse property rights within a static equilibrium framework. In this book David Andersson reformulates property rights theory as an evolutionary theory of the market process.

Chapter 5: Entrepreneurship, Attributes and Judgement

David Emanuel Andersson

Subjects: economics and finance, evolutionary economics, institutional economics

Extract

One of the aims of this book is to propose a unifying framework that combines a theory of entrepreneurship with an institutional theory of economic property rights. In Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit, Frank Knight (1921) proposes that the entrepreneur be treated as the uncertainty-bearing residual claimant. Knight’s definition is especially suitable for the task of connecting entrepreneurship to institutions. This entails a treatment of judgement and uncertainty that goes beyond Joseph Schumpeter’s (1934) and Israel Kirzner’s (1973) more abstract approaches. Still, both Schumpeter and Kirzner capture key aspects of a Knightian entrepreneurial function. Each firm has to make a decision about which mixture of innovation, imitation and inertia to pursue. Computer simulations are useful for analysing the effect of relative innovativeness in different economic environments. One section is therefore devoted to the discussion of a simulation model that studies the relative fitness of various strategy combinations (Hodgson and Knudsen, 2006). The final section relates the theory of entrepreneurship to a broader evolutionary framework, which Loasby (2005) develops by using analogies with biological natural selection. THE THEORY OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP There is no single dominant theory of entrepreneurship, but rather there are several competing theories and variants of theories. The classic statements in entrepreneurship theory are those of Knight (1921), Schumpeter (1934) and Kirzner (1973). All three theories include the contention that entrepreneurship is a type of knowledge that is distinct from human capital, in that there is no market for it. Instead, entrepreneurship is action that creates...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information