Table of Contents

The Role of Intellectual Property Rights in Biotechnology Innovation

The Role of Intellectual Property Rights in Biotechnology Innovation

Edited by David Castle

Intellectual property rights (IPRs), particularly patents, occupy a prominent position in innovation systems, but to what extent they support or hinder innovation is widely disputed. Through the lens of biotechnology, this book delves deeply into the main issues at the crossroads of innovation and IPRs to evaluate claims of the positive and negative impacts of IPRs on innovation.

Chapter 12: On the Comparative Institutional Economics of Intellectual Property in Biotechnology

F. Scott Kieff

Subjects: environment, biotechnology, innovation and technology, biotechnology, law - academic, biotechnology and pharmaceutical law, intellectual property law


F. Scott Kieff 1 INTRODUCTION Despite numerous reforms over the past century,2 important problems continue to plague the IP systems of today, generating numerous proposals for further reform tomorrow. For example, recent high profile cases like the patent litigation threatening to shut down the BlackBerry® service3 have drawn sharp criticism in the business community4 as being prime examples of the pernicious impact of protecting intellectual property (IP) rights with strong property rules, backed up by injunctions, rather than weaker liability rules, which would give rise only to a right to payment.5 Controversial examples more closely linked to biotechnology include the litigation over a potential experimental use exemption for infringement.6 Various forms of liability treatment have been offered. For example, Ayres and Klemperer advocate a patent litigation system characterized by uncertainty and delay, which they show could serve as a form of compulsory license, or liability rule.7 Others simply advocate various exemptions to infringement, such as for what they call fair use.8 Some suggest that the open-source model be applied more generally, including in all bioscience.9 Underlying these critiques of IP is a view that property rights either restrict access or cause anticompetitive effects. The arguments raised today are quite similar to those raised throughout most of the past century; and, as usual, the reform efforts target all three branches of the federal government – legislature, executive agencies, and courts.10 This chapter endeavors to show how addressing these concerns with conventional approaches11 is likely to exacerbate the problems of access and...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information