Table of Contents

Handbook of Research on Strategy Process

Handbook of Research on Strategy Process

Elgar original reference

Edited by Pietro Mazzola and Franz W. Kellermanns

The Handbook of Research on Strategy Process reveals the current state of the art of strategy process research as a whole as well as emerging research initiatives. It also discusses managerial and organizational factors affecting strategy implementation.

Chapter 4: The Strategic Arena Approach to Strategy Process Research

Anders Melander, Leif Melin and Mattias Nordqvist

Subjects: business and management, strategic management


* Anders Melander, Leif Melin and Mattias Nordqvist INTRODUCTION Strategy process research has made significant contributions to the field of strategy since the mid 1970s. It opened up the black box of the organization and showed that strategy is a multi-level phenomenon with social, cultural and political influences at both micro and macro levels (Johnson et al., 2003; Hutzschenreuter and Kleindienst, 2006). Researchers subscribing to a process research view have demonstrated that strategy is made by human beings, where forces and activities driving or counteracting change emerge from human actions. Populating the arena of strategy making with human beings has paved the way for new theoretical contributions (Johnson et al., 2007). Another contribution of strategy process research is to legitimate in-depth case studies (Johnson et al., 2003), from single case studies (e.g. Pettigrew, 1985) to comparative case studies (e.g. Eisenhardt, 1989). In-depth case studies allow researchers to develop holistic and contextual understanding of strategy processes through studying complex forces that may drive both strategic change and stability (Melin, 1986, 1989; Johnson et al., 2003). However, the strategy process tradition has also met some criticism. Johnson et al. (2003), for instance, have identified six limitations and the approach presented in this paper considers directly four of these limitations: ● ● ● Much strategy process research is based on second-hand and retrospective reports. We need more ethnographic and real-time studies to increase our understanding of the micro activities that construct strategy processes. Much strategy process research takes for granted that the top managers are the only...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information