Shareholding System Reform in China

Shareholding System Reform in China

Privatizing by Groping for Stones

Shu-Yun Ma

Since the 1980s, there has been a global wave of transfer of state assets to private hands. China is a relatively late participant of this worldwide trend, yet, in the last decade it has emerged as one of the largest privatizing countries. Shu-Yun Ma argues that China’s privatization is not based on any grand blueprint; rather, it is privatization by ‘groping for stones to cross the river’, a well-known metaphor often attributed to Deng Xiaoping, meaning that the reform simply proceeds on a trial-and-error basis without being guided by any theory.

Chapter 7: Completing Privatization through ‘Share Conversion’

Shu-Yun Ma

Subjects: asian studies, asian business, asian economics, business and management, asia business, international business, economics and finance, asian economics, financial economics and regulation, political economy, politics and public policy, political economy


1 BACKGROUND As mentioned, for political, economic, and ideological reasons, ‘privatization’ (siyouhua) has been taboo in China. But de facto privatization has been underway since the mid-1980s, under the name of ‘shareholding system reform’ (gufenzhi gaige). Under this reform, various types of shares have emerged, including state shares (guojia gu), legal-person shares (faren gu), individual shares (geren gu), and foreign shares (waizi gu), defined according to the type of owner (see Table 7.1). Initially, only individual shares and foreign shares could be traded on the Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges. As a safeguard against loss of state control over enterprises, state shares were made nontradable and legal-person shares could only be transferred among ‘legal-persons’ (that is, enterprises or institutions) (Walter and Howie, 2003, pp. 80–81). Since most legal-persons are actually state entities, legal-person shares and state shares are collectively known as state-owned shares (guoyougu). The nontradability of state-owned shares led to many problems. First, state assets were made ‘dead’ (that is, obsolete) and thus less valuable. Second, property rights of enterprises could Table 7.1 Types of Chinese shares Official holders Type of share State-owned shares, of which: State shares Legal-person shares Individual shares Foreign shares Source: State Council authorized representatives Enterprises, institutions, or authorized social groups Public retail investors, or employees of the companies that issue the shares Foreign investors Based on Walter and Howie, 2003, p. 77. 124 Completing privatization through ‘share conversion’ 125 not be clearly defined among individual investors. Third, capital mobility and economic restructuring were...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information