Global Privacy Protection

Global Privacy Protection

The First Generation

Edited by James B. Rule

Global Privacy Protection reviews the origins and history of national privacy codes as social, political and legal phenomena in Australia, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Hungary, South Korea and the United States. The first chapter reviews key international statements on privacy rights, such as the OECD, EU and APEC principles. In the following chapters, the seven national case studies present and analyze the widest variety of ‘privacy stories’ in an equally varied array of countries. They look beyond the details of what current national data-protection laws allow and prohibit to examine the origins of public concern about privacy; the forces promoting or opposing privacy codes; the roles of media, grassroots activists and elite intervention; and a host of other considerations shaping the present state of privacy protection in each country.

Chapter 4: France

Andre Vitalis

Subjects: law - academic, information and media law, politics and public policy, public policy


Andre Vitalis The implementation of a system called SAFARI1 in the early 1970s first brought to light in France the dangers of data processing for individual liberties. Through that system, the Institut national de la statistique (INS) intended to turn the social security number – which was being computerised at the time – into an exclusive individual identifier. Adoption of that identifier by the various public administrations, together with data matching between their networks, was to enable the aggregation of all information retained on an individual in areas such as schools, the military, health, taxation and employment. On 21 March 1974, Le Monde sparked things off with an article entitled SAFARI ou la chasse aux Français,2 which pointed to the threat of comprehensive file link-up and data matching. The daily newspaper portrayed an allpowerful ministère de l’Intérieur,3 akin to Big Brother and which, equipped with a giant computer, would be able to watch each individual’s every move. The highest officials in the country thus learned first through that article, published in a greatly respected newspaper, about the existence of a system which, under the pretext of a technical modernisation, would drastically transform individual data processing. The secrecy surrounding the operation gave credit to the most alarming hypotheses and fuelled public concern. By dramatising the situation, the press revealed to the public the dangers of file computerisation, a question that had so far been confined to parliamentary circles. In 1970, during the debates about two bills concerning automated...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information