Table of Contents

Handbook of Research on Innovation and Entrepreneurship

Handbook of Research on Innovation and Entrepreneurship

Elgar original reference

Edited by David B. Audretsch, Oliver Falck, Stephan Heblich and Adam Lederer

Leading researchers use their outstanding expertise to investigate various aspects in the context of innovation and entrepreneurship such as growth, knowledge production and spillovers, technology transfer, the organization of the firm, industrial policy, financing, small firms and start-ups, and entrepreneurship education as well as the characteristics of the entrepreneur.

Chapter 2: Between Useful and Useless Innovation: The Entrepreneurial Role

Israel M. Kirzner

Subjects: business and management, entrepreneurship, organisational innovation, economics and finance, economics of innovation, innovation and technology, economics of innovation, organisational innovation


Israel M. Kirzner For many years I have argued for a theoretical understanding of the entrepreneurial role that differs significantly, in certain respects, from that pioneered by Joseph Schumpeter in his celebrated works (e.g. Schumpeter, 1934). Schumpeter identified the entrepreneurial role with the creative and innovative element in the human make-up. So far, so good. No one need take serious issue with this identification. But Schumpeter went further. For Schumpeter, the entrepreneur’s out-of-the-box thinking disrupts the equilibrium that would otherwise tend to emerge in the market economy. The creativity that Schumpeter’s entrepreneur displays is a destructive creativity (in the sense that it disturbs pre-existing stable patterns of production and commercial relationships). At this point there is substantial scope for disagreement. Building on the work of Ludwig von Mises, I have, contrary to Schumpeter, seen the entrepreneurial role as benignly responding to perceived imbalances, to the pockets of perceived or anticipated disequilibrium being continuously revealed in markets. The entrepreneur who correctly identifies and exploits such a perceived imbalance is correcting a poorly coordinated set of decisions that would otherwise have been made. As I see it, the sequence of events set in motion by entrepreneurial discovery is a sequence to which we owe whatever equilibrating tendencies markets possess – rather than (as with Schumpeter) an extraneous (albeit possibly creative and ultimately beneficial) disruption jolting the market away from any initial equilibrium positions that might otherwise have emerged.1 Over the years I have, in response to repeated, valuable (and valued) criticisms, more than...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information