Table of Contents

Public Sector Leadership

Public Sector Leadership

International Challenges and Perspectives

Edited by Jeffrey A. Raffel, Peter Leisink and Anthony E. Middlebrooks

The authors of this book define the issues facing public authorities and organizations in a range of developed nations as they address the challenges of the 21st century. They examine an array of ways leaders across these nations are addressing these challenges. The result is a comprehensive analysis of ways to improve leadership in the public sector and of the role of political and administrative leaders in shaping the future of the public sector. The overriding question addressed by this volume is how public leadership across the globe addresses new challenges (e.g., security, financial, demographic), new expectations of leaders (e.g., New Public Management, multi-sector service provision), and what leadership means in the new public sector.

Chapter 16: Leadership, Administrative Evil and the Ethics of Incompetence: The Failed Response to Hurricane Katrina

Guy B. Adams and Danny L. Balfour

Subjects: business and management, organisation studies, public management, politics and public policy, leadership, public administration and management, public policy


Guy B. Adams and Danny L. Balfour [Hurricane Katrina] . . . is a public administration case study in failure of gigantic proportions. (Ink 2006, p. 800) In pre-modern times natural disasters were believed to be acts of divine retribution, punishments for moral failure and disobedience. Science and technical rationality have banished such beliefs to the margins of modern society. Nevertheless a natural disaster can lay bare the underbelly of society and become a moral debacle in the absence of competent and ethical leadership. The disastrous response to Hurricane Katrina, and subsequent revelations of the shoddy construction of levees around New Orleans, led us to consider the problem of leadership in terms of the following questions. Are acts of incompetence unethical? And do they fit within the definition of administrative evil, where one behaves according to expectations from an organizational or policy perspective and yet participates in a moral failure that results in harm to people? More broadly what is the relationship between incompetence and ethical behavior for leaders? To what extent do ethical failures underlie, or exacerbate, acts of administrative incompetence? These are important questions because, as our case study illustrates, the combination of ethical failure and incompetence appears to greatly increase the likelihood of leadership failures. In addressing these questions we first provide characterizations of evil and administrative evil, and then explain the role of technical rationality as an enabler of administrative evil. Briefly we take note of the touchstone of administrative evil, the Holocaust of World War II. Next we...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information