Handbook of Microcredit in Europe

Handbook of Microcredit in Europe

Social Inclusion through Microenterprise Development

Elgar original reference

Edited by Bárbara Jayo Carboni, Maricruz Lacalle Calderón, Silvia Rico Garrido, Karl Dayson and Jill Kickul

This timely Handbook offers a unique opportunity to consider the performance and national context of microcredit initiatives within the European Union.


Karl Dayson

Subjects: business and management, entrepreneurship, social entrepreneurship, development studies, social entrepreneurship, politics and public policy, social entrepreneurship, social policy and sociology, comparative social policy, economics of social policy


Karl Dayson Microfinance in Europe displays the characteristics of a continent divided for much of the twentieth century, with the MFIs in Eastern Europe linked to the economic renewal following the collapse of the Berlin Wall, while those in the West desired to include all within wealthy societies. It was noticeable that the chapters in microfinance in Eastern Europe took the early 1990s as the historical starting point. This was in sharp contrast with Western Europe where considerable stress was placed in antecedents from previous centuries. More specifically, both Italy and Portugal mentioned church-based charities in the fifteenth century, while Germany, Sweden, Belgium, the Netherlands and the UK chapters discussed the early cooperative societies during the Industrial Revolution. It would be unlikely that the cooperative movement was completely absent from Eastern Europe, though it is undoubtedly the case that the Industrial Revolution proceeded earlier in the West. What this historical discontinuity indicates is partially the authors’ own perspective, but also the cultural disconnection that occurred in Eastern Europe during the twentieth century. Thus, when capitalism was reintroduced, a new discourse on microfinance had to be established, much of which was imported from the USA. By contrast, the Western European nations were able to draw upon historical precedent for contemporary microfinance activity. This was undertaken because microfinance was associated with NGOs, particularly NGOs from the USA, which sought to promote economic growth in the developing world. To suggest a ‘reverse colonialization’ of policy carried political risks. Instead, supporters of MFIs sought...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information