Continuity and Change in Public Policy and Management

Continuity and Change in Public Policy and Management

Christopher Pollitt and Geert Bouckaert

Combining theory development, international comparison and original case study analysis, two of Europe’s leading public policy and management scholars apply and develop some of the main models of policy change and offer a revealing long-term view of policy developments since 1965. Drawing on an extensive programme of elite interviews and documentary analysis they provide an integrated treatment of national and local policymaking in two major public services – hospital care and the police – in England and Belgium. This timely book addresses the ‘paradigm wars’ in public policy, arguing for a nuanced intermediate position that challenges the orthodox and the post-modernists alike.

Chapter 1: Theory and Method in Comparative Studies of Organizational Change

Christopher Pollitt and Geert Bouckaert

Subjects: politics and public policy, public policy


INTRODUCTION 1.1 This book presents a comparative analysis. It is comparative in at least four senses: ● ● ● ● It compares public policymaking and management in two countries, England and Belgium. It compares two major public services, hospitals and the police. It compares shifts in national policies with what was actually happening in two specific localities (and is thus, in current parlance, a study in ‘multilevel government’). It compares developments over time (diachronic comparisons). We hope that readers will find each and all of these comparisons intrinsically interesting, but here at the outset we must warn that none of the four are straightforward. As we shall see, there are many obstacles and difficult choices involved in each of these comparisons, and the voluminous literature on public policy and management shows quite clearly that there is no academic consensus on the best way to make them. Because of this, the discussion within our book will alternate frequently between two (mutually dependent) levels: first, that of actually comparing ‘things’ (political systems, hospital financing systems and so on); and second, ways of making those comparisons – how does one do it? To give readers a framework for the substantive descriptions and discussions that come later, this first chapter will concentrate on the ‘how’ question, and will briefly introduce some of the main issues. Right at the end of the book (Chapter 9), when the substantive analyses are complete, we will return to these questions of theory and method, to review what we have learned. 1 2 Continuity...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information