The Regional Economics of Knowledge and Talent

The Regional Economics of Knowledge and Talent

Local Advantage in a Global Context

New Horizons in Regional Science series

Edited by Charlie Karlsson, Börje Johansson and Roger R. Stough

The distinguished contributors advance the current research frontier in three novel directions which focus on: the role of human capital and talent for creativity, entrepreneurship and regional development; the role of institutions for the behaviour of firms and entrepreneurs; and the influence of the global context on the location, export and innovation behaviour of firms in a knowledge economy.

Chapter 3: Innovation and Space – From Externalities to Networks

Corinne Autant-Bernard, Pascal Billand and Nadine Massard

Subjects: business and management, knowledge management, economics and finance, regional economics, innovation and technology, knowledge management, urban and regional studies, regional economics


Corinne Autant-Bernard, Pascal Billand and Nadine Massard 3.1 INTRODUCTION There are many studies describing the geographical structure of innovative activities within various countries, both in the American and European contexts.1 All of these studies register a considerable spatial polarization of activities connected with innovation. They are accompanied by a relatively high theoretical production, which, since the end of the 1980s, has aimed to describe the different forms of local development through innovation. Local innovation systems, districts, technopoles, scientific parks, innovative environments, high-tech clusters – the terms are many and often correspond to differing views of the innovation processes and their inscription in space. Such differences are often the result of underlying theoretical traditions, as are the normative ambitions attributed to these concepts (Massard and Torre, 2005). Beyond these differences, however, all have one term in common: they are based largely upon the notion of geographical externalities. The positive impact of geographical proximity upon innovation seems essentially to be due to a limiting of the diffusion of knowledge externalities in space. This simple hypothesis, for which the theoretical implications concerning ‘local advantages’ are quite heavy, has led to a few dangerous short-cuts in terms of public policies. A review of the empirical studies that developed at the beginning of the 1990s, attempting, in particular, to measure the geographical dimension of these externalities, highlights the many subtleties of this hypothesis (Autant-Bernard et al., 2008). It provides elements for analysis that enable a finer understanding of the relations between innovation and space and the...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information