Table of Contents

The International Handbook of Gender and Poverty

The International Handbook of Gender and Poverty

Concepts, Research, Policy

Elgar original reference

Edited by Sylvia Chant

In the interests of contextualising (and nuancing) the multiple interrelations between gender and poverty, Sylvia Chant has gathered writings on diverse aspects of the subject from a range of disciplinary and professional perspectives, achieving extensive thematic as well as geographical coverage. This benchmark volume presents women’s and men’s experiences of gendered poverty with respect to a vast spectrum of intersecting issues including local to global economic transformations, family, age, ‘race’, migration, assets, paid and unpaid work, health, sexuality, human rights, and conflict and violence.

Chapter 103: Sexuality, Gender and Poverty

Susie Jolly and Andrea Cornwall

Subjects: development studies, development studies, family and gender policy, geography, human geography, research methods in geography, law - academic, human rights, politics and public policy, human rights, social policy and sociology, family and gender policy


Susie Jolly and Andrea Cornwall Gender may have gained greater visibility in mainstream development over the last decade, but it is only very recently that the interactions between gender, sexuality and poverty have become more apparent. Development’s approach to sexuality has tended to be to reduce it to sex, and to treat it as a problem. We tend to hear about sexuality usually only in relation to disease and violence, and rarely in relation to the more positive sides of life (Cornwall, 2006 [see Acknowledgements at the end of the chapter]; Gosine, 1998; Jolly, 2007 [see Acknowledgements]). Pleasure and love are not presumed important to the ‘subjects’ of development – poor people in the Global South. Gosine (1998: 5) contrasts representations of sex between white people, as ‘about desire, love, romance and pleasure’, and between non-white people as ‘about reproduction, fertility control, stupidity and misery’. While development has become much less explicitly gender-blind, it is frequently sexualityblind: much of what we see in development policies and programmes is framed in ways that are generally negative and implicitly or explicitly heteronormative – that is, making the assumption that particular forms of heterosexuality, notably marriage, are everyone’s norm (see also Lind, Chapter 100, this volume; Moore, Chapter 3, this volume). The silences, absences and assumptions that permeate mainstream development policy speak as much about how sexuality, gender and poverty interact, as the little that is explicitly said about these interactions. Take population, for example. It is common to find a focus only on demographic...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information