Table of Contents

Banking, Monetary Policy and the Political Economy of Financial Regulation

Banking, Monetary Policy and the Political Economy of Financial Regulation

Essays in the Tradition of Jane D'Arista

Edited by Gerald A. Epstein, Tom Schlesinger and Matías Vernengo

The many forces that led to the economic crisis of 2008 were in fact identified, analyzed and warned against for many years before the crisis by economist Jane D’Arista, among others. Now, writing in the tradition of D’Arista's extensive work, the internationally renowned contributors to this thought-provoking book discuss research carried out on various indicators of the crisis and illustrate how these perspectives can contribute to productive thinking on monetary and financial policies.

Chapter 5: Heterodox central bankers: Eccles, Prebisch and financial reform

Matías Vernengo and Esteban Pérez Caldentey

Subjects: economics and finance, financial economics and regulation, political economy, politics and public policy, political economy

Extract

Central bankers have been defined as men that lend you an umbrella, and then want it back when it starts to rain. The Great Depression saw plenty of rain, so to speak, but some central bankers did not fit the stereotype. The reason is that the Great Depression led to a need to rethink the principles of central banking, as much as it led to the rethinking of economics in general, with the Keynesian Revolution at the forefront of the so-called “years of high theory,” during which much of the rethinking was done (Shackle, 1967). In the center the tenets of sound finance and the Gold Standard were threatened by the economic collapse, and the heightened social conflicts that followed rising unemployment. The conventional wisdom suggests that central bankers dismissed the so-called real bills doctrine, and developed an activist view of the central bank. In this view, the abandonment of the real bills doctrine allowed a more active control of money supply and credit. In contrast to that argument, we suggest that the role of the monetary authority as a fiscal agent of government and the abandonment of the view of the economy as self-regulated were the main changes in central banking. In addition, in the periphery, central banks changed to try to insulate the worst effects of balance of payments crises, and the use of capital controls became acceptable.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information