Handbook on Research in Relationship Marketing

Handbook on Research in Relationship Marketing

Elgar original reference

Edited by Robert M. Morgan, Janet Turner Parish and George Deitz

The Handbook on Research in Relationship Marketing includes contributions from relationship marketing experts in business-to-business, business-to-consumer, global services, technology and a variety of other contexts of practice. Academics, students, and marketing professionals will all benefit from the insights provided. The Handbook begins with reviews of the developments in relationship marketing over the last two decades by noted relationship marketing scholars including Jagdish Sheth, Atul Parvatiyar, Evert Gummesson and Robert Morgan. It continues with detailed discussions of special topics that will be valuable to anyone interested in relationship marketing.

Chapter 12: Gratitude in relationship marketing

Randle D. Raggio, Anna Green Walz, Mousumi Bose and Judith Anne Garretson Folse

Subjects: business and management, marketing


For centuries, gratitude has been portrayed by theologians, moral philosophers, and writers as an indispensable manifestation of virtue – an excellence of character. For example, gratitude is not only a highly prized human disposition in Jewish, Christian, Muslim, Buddhist, and Hindu thought, but deemed an unrivaled quality in these traditions, essential for living life well. The consensus among the world’s religious and ethical writers is that people are morally obligated to feel and express gratitude in response to received benefits. For example, Adam Smith, the legendary economist and philosopher, proposed [in The Theory of Moral Sentiments] that gratitude is a vital civic virtue, absolutely essential for the healthy functioning of societies. (Emmons 2004: 3, internal citations removed) In 1759 (250 years ago at this writing), Adam Smith ([1759] 2000: 94) wrote in The Theory of Moral Sentiments: “The sentiment which most immediately and directly prompts us to reward, is gratitude . . . To reward, is to recompense, to remunerate, to return good for good received.” The concept of “reward” may seem inappropriate in the realm of economic exchanges that are governed by formal and informal governance structures designed to force compliance and ensure performance. Indeed, actions prompted by structures established to mitigate opportunism and hold parties to their respective obligations hardly seem consistent with the notion of a “reward.”

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information