Table of Contents

Handbook on the Economics of Leisure

Handbook on the Economics of Leisure

Elgar original reference

Edited by Samuel Cameron

Surprisingly, the field of leisure economics is not, thus far, a particularly integrated or coherent one. In this Handbook a wide ranging body of international scholars get to grips with the core issues, taking in the traditional income/leisure choice model of textbook microeconomics and Becker’s allocation of time model along the way. They expertly apply economics to some usually neglected topics, such as boredom and sleeping, work–life balance, dating, tourism, health and fitness, sport, video games, social networking, music festivals and sex. Contributions from further afield by Veblen, Sctivosky and Bourdieu also feature prominently.

Chapter 4: Leisure and Subjective Well-being

Victoria Ateca-Amestoy

Subjects: development studies, tourism, economics and finance, cultural economics, sports, environment, tourism, geography, tourism, social policy and sociology, sociology and sociological theory


Victoria Ateca-Amestoy1 INTRODUCTION In September 2009, the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress, a project launched by French President Nicolas Sarkozy and chaired by the Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz, released its results with wide media coverage (Stiglitz et al., 2009). The final report identified the limitations of GDP as an indicator of economic performance and social progress. It also sent out messages on the need to go beyond productive factors to measure economic performance and people’s actual well-being. Among those messages, it highlighted the need to measure non-market activities such as leisure or unpaid domestic work. The commission recognized the contribution of leisure to subjective wellbeing, and pointed out that ‘changes in the amount of leisure over time and differences between countries represent one of the more important aspects of the situation of well-being in these respects’ (p. 37). It singled out the importance of developing indicators of ‘both leisure quantity (number of hours) and quality (number of episodes, where they took place, presence of other people), as well as measures of participation in cultural events and of “poor leisure”’ (p. 49). The possibility of using indicators that go beyond materialistic objective measurements is not new in economics. However, economists have been reluctant to incorporate subjective outcomes into economic analysis (at least with respect to other social sciences). In an article published in 2002 in the Journal of Economic Literature, Bruno Frey and Alois Stutzer present a survey under the title ‘What can economists learn...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information