Current Issues in Project Analysis for Development

Current Issues in Project Analysis for Development

Elgar original reference

Edited by John Weiss and David Potts

This major work brings together authors with experience of both academic and operational project work to focus on issues such as the shadow exchange rate, the shadow wage, the discount rate and assessment of poverty impact and risk, as well as problems relating to specific sectors covering environmental projects, transport, education and health. There are also general chapters on the experience of semi-input–output-based estimation of shadow prices and the relevance of shadow pricing techniques to the context of developed economies in the EU. An overview by the editors sets out the evolution of the literature and highlights current issues. The general conclusion is that project analysis techniques remain relevant, albeit within a very different development context to that in which they were originally envisaged to be applied.

Chapter 6: Projects and Risk

John Weiss and Keith Ward

Subjects: development studies, development economics, economics and finance, development economics


John Weiss and Keith Ward Uncertainty about future project values is present in all projects and in practice is addressed with differing degrees of rigour. The theory underlying these adjustments has been known for a long time. In an uncertain world where decision takers are unconcerned about the level of risk (risk-neutrality) expected future effects must be estimated based on their probability of occurrence and a measure of project worth calculated at a discount rate that is unadjusted for risk. This is the standard assumption applied in the appraisal of many public sector projects. Alternatively, where risk is perceived as a cost by decision takers (risk-aversion), there are two possible approaches. In one approach, future expected effects are adjusted for risk by conversion to a certainty equivalent value.1 If this is done the normal unadjusted discount rate can be applied. In the other approach future effects are valued at their expected future value but the discount rate is adjusted upwards to incorporate risk. In other words, where decision takers place a cost on risk, either net benefits are adjusted downwards or the discount rate is raised. Theoretically the procedure of adjusting the discount rate upwards by a fixed margin to address risk is likely to be misleading since it will only be correct where uncertainty increases through time. In practice a majority of public sector appraisals adopt the expected value (or probabilityweighted) approach to risk, which has been greatly simplified by the advent of computer software packages. However, there are...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information