Table of Contents

Comparative Constitutional Law

Comparative Constitutional Law

Research Handbooks in Comparative Law series

Edited by Tom Ginsburg and Rosalind Dixon

This landmark volume of specially commissioned, original contributions by top international scholars organizes the issues and controversies of the rich and rapidly maturing field of comparative constitutional law.

Chapter 3: Participation in Constitutional Design

Justin Blount

Subjects: law - academic, comparative law, constitutional and administrative law


Justin Blount Ours is an era of constitution-making. Approximately one-quarter of the world’s written constitutions have been promulgated since 1974 (Elkins et al., 2009a). The trend over this period has been one of increasing public participation in the constitutional design process. To cite but one example, among currently in-force constitutions specifying their own promulgation procedure, more than 40 percent required public ratification via referendum. The comparable figure for 1950 is approximately 5 percent, even though the proportion of texts specifying any promulgation procedure whatsoever is roughly equivalent (Ginsburg et al., 2009). The new constitutionalism that has emerged over this period places as much emphasis on process as it does on outcomes (Hart, 2001). In light of this, the formal provision of democratic institutions is no longer sufficient to establish the democratic bona fides of a constitution. Because a constitution is the highest level of lawmaking and provides the ultimate rule of recognition for lawmaking processes (Kelsen, 1945; Hart, 1961), it requires the greatest possible level of legitimation in democratic theory. This need for legitimation dictates that a democratic constitution must be fashioned by democratic means in acknowledgment of the moral claim of a people to the right to participate in the creation of the rules under which they will be governed (Hart, 2001 and 2003; Samuels, 2005). Participation through input, through ratification and through oversight all differ conceptually, but all are treated as contributing to a process in which the citizen is ‘involved’ in some sense. Like constitution-making in general,...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information