Table of Contents

Comparative Constitutional Law

Comparative Constitutional Law

Research Handbooks in Comparative Law series

Edited by Tom Ginsburg and Rosalind Dixon

This landmark volume of specially commissioned, original contributions by top international scholars organizes the issues and controversies of the rich and rapidly maturing field of comparative constitutional law.

Chapter 22: The Comparative Constitutional Law of Freedom of Expression

Adrienne Stone

Subjects: law - academic, comparative law, constitutional and administrative law

Extract

Adrienne Stone Freedom of expression is among the most widely protected of constitutional rights. Rights of freedom of expression can be found in constitutions drawn from all continents: throughout western Europe as well as in the constitutions of the new democracies of Eastern Europe, in constitutions in Asia, South America, Africa and Australasia (Barendt 2005; Krotoszynski 2006; Rishworth et al. 2003; Currie and de Waal 2005; Stone 2005). Even in those few democracies without comprehensive constitutional protection of rights, freedom of expression finds constitutional protection in other ways. It can plausibly be argued that parliamentary systems like the United Kingdom and New Zealand – even in the era before the adoption of charters of rights – recognized a constitutional principle of freedom of expression that, though not enforceable by judicial review, was understood as a fundamental value that informed the reading of statutes and the common law (Barendt 2005, p. 40; Rishworth et al. 2003, p. 308). In addition, there are some legal systems that recognize a judicially enforceable principle of freedom of expression despite the absence of a written constitutional right. The Australian Constitution contains no textual provision that protects freedom of expression but the Australian courts have recognized an unwritten principle of freedom of ‘political communication’ as a necessary incident of the establishment of democratic government (Stone 2005). A somewhat similar development has occurred in Israel where the Supreme Court has derived a principle of freedom of expression from the rather textually sparse provisions of Israel’s Basic Law (Navot 2007,...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information