Does Decentralization Enhance Service Delivery and Poverty Reduction?

Does Decentralization Enhance Service Delivery and Poverty Reduction?

Studies in Fiscal Federalism and State–local Finance series

Edited by Ehtisham Ahmad and Giorgio Brosio

Does decentralization enhance service delivery and poverty reduction? Drawing on cutting edge research, expert contributors address this fundamental question facing policy-makers in developing as well as advanced countries. This timely book builds upon insights on the recent developments in the intergovernmental literature first outlined in the Handbook of Fiscal Federalism. New empirical evidence from across the globe is presented: policy-oriented chapters evaluate fiscal federalism with an emphasis on the effectiveness of decentralized service delivery, the decentralization process in different parts of the world is appraised, and specially commissioned research focuses on the political economy process and the outcomes of the decentralization process. The role of international agencies, as explicit donors, is examined in several chapters.

Chapter 10: Evaluating the Effects of Decentralization on Public Service Delivery: The Spanish Experience

Albert Solé-Ollé

Subjects: economics and finance, public finance

Extract

Albert Solé-Ollé* 1 INTRODUCTION In the last three decades, a substantial number of developed and developing countries have initiated processes of decentralization of responsibilities regarding the provision of public services (Shah and Thompson, 2004). The exact meaning of the word decentralization differs from country to country. In some cases, decentralization means to transfer administrative responsibilities to decentralized agencies, while in many cases it involves the creation of elected lower-tier governments (Shah, 1998). Even in the case of politically autonomous entities, the transfer of responsibilities is often partial (Ahmad et al., 2006), in the sense that the central government retains important regulatory and/or financing powers over service provision,1 so there is wide variation both in the kind and depth of the decentralization reform. But the motives for decentralization are as varied as its meaning. In many cases, decentralization is a crucial ingredient of a democratization package, as in Latin America or the former communist countries (Jakubowski and Topińska, 2009). In other cases, decentralization is seen as a way to appease secessionist regions and reduce the level of ethnic and regional conflict, as in Indonesia or South Africa (see, for example, Inman and Rubinfeld, 2005). There are also a few cases where the aim was to improve the delivery of public services, and the World Bank and other donors used to emphasize this goal (World Bank, 1999). But, as long as democracy and good governance are a precondition for the improvement of public services (Shah, 2006), even those cases...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information