Cultural Diversity, European Identity and the Legitimacy of the EU

Cultural Diversity, European Identity and the Legitimacy of the EU

Studies in EU Reform and Enlargement series

Edited by Dieter Fuchs and Hans-Dieter Klingemann

As a consequence of various rounds of EU enlargements, the degree of cultural diversity in Europe has intensified – a phenomenon which is increasingly perceived as problematic by many EU citizens. This fascinating book not only empirically explores the current state of the identity and the legitimacy of the EU as viewed by its citizens, but also evaluates their attitudes towards it.

Chapter 9: Explaining Support for European Integration: An Attitudinal Model

Dieter Fuchs

Subjects: politics and public policy, public policy

Extract

Dieter Fuchs 9.1 Introduction Since the beginning of the 1990s, scientific interest in explaining support or rejection for European integration has soared. This development has at least two causes. First, following the Treaty of Maastricht (1992), a number of European Union (EU) member states have conducted referenda concerning European issues and in some of these referenda citizens have rejected the agreements forged by political elites. Second, many observers assert that there has been an increase in Euroscepticism since Maastricht (cf. contributions by Hooghe and Marks 2007 published in a special issue of Acta Politica on ‘understanding Euroscepticism’). Thus, even if we do not reflect upon the degree to which Euroscepticism has spread and increased,1 it is clear that over the course of time European integration has become politicized to an extent that no longer allows for it to be conducted as an elite project. Rather it requires the support of the citizens. The question then is why do citizens support or reject European integration? The question has been addressed by a plethora of studies and ‘yet there is no scholarly consensus on the answer’ (Hooghe and Marks 2005, p. 420). This may be partly due to the fact that extant studies draw on different explanatory strategies. Liesbet Hooghe and Gary Marks (2005) have sought to further the discussion by pursuing a synthetic approach which aggregates the most relevant ‘families of explanation’. A similar approach can be found in Lauren McLaren’s works (2007; cf. also 2006). The following analysis will...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information