Table of Contents

Comparative Administrative Law

Comparative Administrative Law

Research Handbooks in Comparative Law series

Edited by Susan Rose-Ackerman and Peter L. Lindseth

This research handbook is a comprehensive overview of the field of comparative administrative law. The specially commissioned chapters in this landmark volume represent a broad, multi-method approach combining perspectives from history and social science with more strictly legal analyses. Comparisons of the United States, continental Europe, and the British Commonwealth are complemented by contributions that focus on Latin America, Africa, and Asia. The work aims to stimulate comparative research on public law, reaching across countries and scholarly disciplines.

Chapter 3: Testing Weber: Compensation for Public Services, Bureaucratization, and the Development of Positive Law in the United States

Nicholas Parrillo

Subjects: law - academic, comparative law, constitutional and administrative law

Extract

Nicholas Parrillo From the colonial period through much of the nineteenth century and sometimes into the twentieth, public officers in the United States frequently received their pay in the forms of fees-for-service, commissions, rewards, and other types of compensation that varied, in a direct and objective way, with the business of their offices and the way in which they exercised their powers. My larger research project aims to document and explain this lost system of compensation, as well as its gradual replacement – in different offices and jurisdictions at different times over more than a century – by the fixed salaries that have since come to be taken for granted in the public service. Essentially, I am tracing the way in which legislators, by reforming the way officers were paid, made the absence of the profit motive a defining feature of ‘government’ in the United States. This kind of transition took place in many countries. There are major historical analyses of profit-seeking government in England, though far less attention has been paid to its demise.1 And there is no modern scholarly attempt to analyze profit-seeking, or its decline, across American government. Histories of compensation in American government are widely scattered, appearing in monographs focused on a single public function (or occasionally a few related ones), with compensation often treated as an incidental matter.2 In the absence of synthetic works focused on the United States, the most familiar framework for understanding the rise of salaries is derived from Max Weber. Weber’s interpretation is...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information