Table of Contents

Comparative Administrative Law

Comparative Administrative Law

Research Handbooks in Comparative Law series

Edited by Susan Rose-Ackerman and Peter L. Lindseth

This research handbook is a comprehensive overview of the field of comparative administrative law. The specially commissioned chapters in this landmark volume represent a broad, multi-method approach combining perspectives from history and social science with more strictly legal analyses. Comparisons of the United States, continental Europe, and the British Commonwealth are complemented by contributions that focus on Latin America, Africa, and Asia. The work aims to stimulate comparative research on public law, reaching across countries and scholarly disciplines.

Chapter 30: Contracting Out and ‘Public Values’: A Theoretical and Comparative Approach

Jean-Bernard Auby

Subjects: law - academic, comparative law, constitutional and administrative law


Jean-Bernard Auby When ‘public tasks’ are entrusted to private actors through contracts – be they ‘Private Finance Initiative’ (PFI) contracts in Great Britain, ‘concesiones de obras publicas’ in Spain, ‘délégations de service public’ in France, public-private partnerships of various kinds elsewhere – how can we ensure that these tasks are performed in ways that respect ‘public values’? By that, I mean, of course, the core legal principles that public bodies must themselves respect when they act directly. These principles are both substantive (such as respect for fundamental rights, transparency, non-discrimination, or proportionality) and procedural (such as due process, or notice and comment rulemaking). This question is neither quite new nor particularly old. It raises intellectual and legal conundrums that administrative law must confront if it is to respond to current developments in state/society relations. It is, one might say, a characteristically post-modern administrative law question. The chapter is organized as follows. Section 1 defines the basic, generic risks inherent in contracting out, so that my comparisons can really focus on comparable matters. Section 2 argues that one must distinguish between two different – although related – problems: those that concern applicability and those that concern enforcement. Section 3 then claims that all legal systems, and, most importantly, all systems of administrative law, find these problems difficult to solve effectively. In conclusion, Section 4 sketches out some hypotheses that could explain why administrative law systems have that difficulty. 1. Contracting out: the risk of public values avoidance 1.1. The concept of contracting out...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information