Table of Contents

Comparative Administrative Law

Comparative Administrative Law

Research Handbooks in Comparative Law series

Edited by Susan Rose-Ackerman and Peter L. Lindseth

This research handbook is a comprehensive overview of the field of comparative administrative law. The specially commissioned chapters in this landmark volume represent a broad, multi-method approach combining perspectives from history and social science with more strictly legal analyses. Comparisons of the United States, continental Europe, and the British Commonwealth are complemented by contributions that focus on Latin America, Africa, and Asia. The work aims to stimulate comparative research on public law, reaching across countries and scholarly disciplines.

Chapter 31: Organizational Structure, Institutional Culture and Norm Compliance in an Era of Privatization: The Case of US Military Contractors

Laura A. Dickinson

Subjects: law - academic, comparative law, constitutional and administrative law


Laura A. Dickinson* The privatization of governmental functions has long since become a fixture of the American political landscape. From the management of prisons, to the provision of welfare and other services, to the running of schools, federal and state governments in the United States have handed over more and more tasks to either for-profit or nonprofit private enterprises. Indeed, a 2003 Harvard Law Review symposium went so far as to declare ours an ‘Era of Privatization’ (Symposium: Public Values in an Era of Privatization 2003). While some scholars have extolled the cost savings that privatization may bring, others have expressed deep misgivings (for example, Domberger and Jensen 1997: 72–5), arguing that privatization threatens to erode legal and democratic accountability (Dolovich 2005). Such scholars worry that, because private actors are usually not subject to the constitutional and administrative law norms that apply to governments (Metzger 2003: 1374–76), any purported efficiency gains from privatization may come at the cost of losing important public values.1 More recently, an emerging middle-ground position embraces privatization while seeking new mechanisms for extending public values through contract (for example, Freeman 2000), democratic participation (for example, Aman 2004), and other modes of accountability.2 Despite this rich debate about privatization in the domestic context, far less attention has been paid to the simultaneous privatization of what might be called the foreign affairs functions of government. Yet privatization is as significant in the international realm as it is domestically. The United States now regularly relies on private...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information