Nations of Immigrants

Nations of Immigrants

Australia and the USA Compared

Monash Studies in Global Movements series

Edited by John Higley, John Nieuwenhuysen and Stine Neerup

This timely book examines the immense surges in immigration since the mid-1990s in Australia and the United States, two of the world’s most important settler-receiving countries.

Chapter 9: Latinos, Immigration and Social Cohesion in the United States

David L. Leal

Subjects: development studies, development studies, migration, politics and public policy, international politics, international relations, migration, public policy, social policy and sociology, migration, urban and regional studies, migration

Extract

David L. Leal1 The central focus of any discussion of immigration and social cohesion in the US today is the Latino population, which numbered 44.3 million people in 2006. This population is a diverse mix of families who have lived in the formerly Mexican territories of the US Southwest for many generations and larger numbers of more recent arrivals from Mexico, Central and South America and the Caribbean. Although immigration to the US has diversified considerably since the 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), the public imagination and political debate tend to conflate Latinos with immigrants in general. Immigrants from Asia, Africa and other non-Western regions receive less attention, are the object of less concern, and are often contrasted positively with Latinos. When the INA was enacted in 1965 the official rhetoric was that it did not herald a dramatic shift in immigration policy. At the Act’s signing ceremony President Lyndon Johnson stated that ‘This bill . . . is not a revolutionary bill. It does not affect the lives of millions. It will not reshape the structure of our daily lives’. Stemming in part from a desire to abolish the internationally embarrassing racial restrictions of the 1920s, and in part from the fact that immigration from Europe had declined far below its allotments, the INA instituted a preference system that prioritized family reunification and to some degree work-related skills. Whether Johnson’s statement was an innocent mistake or a deliberate effort at obfuscation, the reality was a renewal of immigration that would transform...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information