New Trends in Financing Civil Litigation in Europe

New Trends in Financing Civil Litigation in Europe

A Legal, Empirical, and Economic Analysis

New Horizons in Law and Economics series

Edited by Mark Tuil and Louis Visscher

This unique and timely book analyses the problem of financing civil litigation. The expert contributors discuss the legal possibilities and difficulties associated with several instruments – including cost shifting, fee arrangements, legal expense insurance and group litigation.

Chapter 2: A Law and Economics Approach to Cost Shifting, Fee Arrangements and Legal Expense Insurance

Louis Visscher and Tom Schepens

Subjects: economics and finance, law and economics, law - academic, european law, law and economics


Louis Visscher and Tom Schepens INTRODUCTION 1. In this chapter, we will provide an overview of the economic literature regarding cost shifting, fee arrangements and legal expense insurance. In the economic analysis of law, legal rules are regarded as instruments which can provide actors with behavioural incentives. In essence, private law (torts, contracts, property, etc.) allocates the costs which arise out of different activities. Those costs may only be borne by the party causing them if the party initially suffering from them brings suit. Problems in financing civil litigation may effectively hinder such lawsuits, so that the behavioural incentives which the law intends to provide do not reach the party causing the harm. For example, tort law is regarded as an instrument that induces people to take care. The prospect of being held liable after negligently having caused losses may induce a potential tortfeasor to take due care, because taking due care (thereby avoiding liability) is less costly than taking too little care (and being liable). Contract law is seen as a device that enables people to increase welfare by engaging in voluntary transactions. The remedies of contract law (specific performance and damages) induce the debtor to fulfil his contractual duties when this is less costly than breaching the contract and facing the sanction. If the victim of a tort or the creditor in a contractual setting does not bring a claim against the tortfeasor or the debtor, neither the tortfeasor nor debtor would face any expected sanction. This would...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information