Table of Contents

Handbook of Research Methods on Trust

Handbook of Research Methods on Trust

Elgar original reference

Edited by Fergus Lyon, Guido Möllering and Mark N.K. Saunders

The Handbook of Research Methods on Trust provides an authoritative in-depth consideration of quantitative and qualitative methods for empirical study of trust in the social sciences. As this topic has matured, a growing number of practical approaches and techniques has been utilised across the broad, multidisciplinary community of trust research, providing both insights and challenges. This unique Handbook draws together a wealth of research methods knowledge gained by trust researchers into one essential volume. The contributors examine different methodological issues and particular methods, as well as share their experiences of what works, what does not work, challenges and innovations.

Chapter 12: Mixed Method Applications in Trust Research: Simultaneous Hybrid Data Collection in Cross-cultural Settings Using the Board Game Method

Miriam Muethel

Subjects: business and management, organisation studies, research methods in business and management, research methods, qualitative research methods, research methods in business and management


Miriam Muethel INTRODUCTION Cross-cultural studies on trust often face problems due to culturedependent differences in the understanding of what trust actually is. In this situation, simultaneous collection of qualitative and quantitative data can help the researcher to examine the underlying issues. The board game method introduced in this chapter supports such data collection. Mixed method application, that is the collection and analysis of qualitative and quantitative data, enables complementary data use (Yauch and Steudel, 2003). The combination of both types of data supports a more profound understanding of trust, particularly in cross-cultural settings (Pearsall, 1998: 623). Cross-cultural trust comparisons, for example, might suffer from culturally driven differences in underlying definitions. Such differences have been shown, for example with regard to trustworthiness, and more particularly honesty (Meglino et al., 1992). Although honesty has been shown to be a universal value, cultural influences lead to either an absolute understanding of honesty where there is just one truth that is not bound to any contextual influences (Locke and Woiceshyn, 1995); or a relative understanding where social relations primarily determine social behavior, so that truth becomes relative to the contextual influences (Muethel and Hoegl, 2007). In dealing with such culture-bound differences in the understanding of trust, researchers may wish to discover not only how evaluations of trustworthiness are made but also why. Enhanced insights about the interpretation of trustworthiness can then aid our understanding of variances in the evaluation and, in particular, whether they stem from real or from spurious discrepancies. Real discrepancies are...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information