Table of Contents

Corporate Social Responsibility and Human Resource Management

Corporate Social Responsibility and Human Resource Management

A Diversity Perspective

Edited by Mine Karataş-Ozkan, Katerina Nicolopoulou and Mustafa F Özbilgin

This innovative book analyses the intersection between the fields of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Human Resource Management (HRM), with a focus on diversity management. The book presents the scope of institutional engagements with CSR and diversity policies in a range of organisations and organisational networks.

Chapter 14: Leadership and CSR in developing countries: the case of the UAE

Abubakr M. Suliman and Sumina Thomas

Subjects: business and management, corporate social responsibility, human resource management, organisation studies


Industrialization, modernization and the inevitable phenomenon of globalization have transformed the role of business organizations in the community. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) refers to a firm’s responsibility towards the society it operates in. This concept has gained significance over the last three decades. With rising consciousness of organizational leaders about the consequences of their firms’ actions on society, CSR becomes one of the most extensively discussed topics at management meetings. This in turn implies that corporate leadership has a remarkable influence on the CSR approach that firms adopt and, in turn, its social performance. McManus (2008) states that truth undergoes three stages: first, it is mocked, then insistently opposed and lastly acknowledged as plain obvious. Debate on the role of business in society has had a similar experience. There are two prominent viewpoints on the role of business in society. According to the classical school of thought, supported by Friedman (cited in Schwartz and Carroll 2003), the primary role of business organizations is to legally maximize profits and increase shareholder value. The society is the responsibility of the government. However, the alternative school of thought advocates that firms have equal responsibility towards all stakeholders and society in general. Organizations, their stakeholders and society exist in a dynamic symbiotic relationship. The evolving nature of the business environment no longer permits firms to be independent and unaccountable (Qasim et al. 2011).

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information