Table of Contents

Handbook of Employee Engagement

Handbook of Employee Engagement

Perspectives, Issues, Research and Practice

New Horizons in Management series

Edited by Simon L. Albrecht

The Handbook presents comprehensive and global perspectives to help researchers and practitioners identify, understand, evaluate and apply the key theories, models, measures and interventions associated with employee engagement. It provides many new insights, practical applications and areas for future research. It will serve as an important platform for ongoing research and practice on employee engagement.

Chapter 2: The Essence of Engagement: Lessons from the Field

William A. Kahn

Subjects: business and management, human resource management, organisational behaviour


William A. Kahn Introduction Engagement is an enormously appealing concept. We seem to intuitively understand what it means, and believe that it helps to explain something about how people are (or ought to be) at work. The problem, of course, is that many of us have different understandings of what engagement is. We all believe that it is a good thing to be engaged, particularly in contrast to being disengaged, which suggests absence. But we are just not exactly sure what engagement really looks like, except that it involves people working hard and caring about what they are doing. This seems like a good thing, for individuals, their organizations and its customers, and the quality of the work that gets done. Beyond that, there is much divergence in terms of what, exactly, engagement is. This divergence makes it difficult for us to agree on how to get more people engaged at work. I have been thinking about, researching, and helping people and organizations with engagement for almost thirty years. I developed the concept of engagement to explain what traditional studies of work motivation overlooked – namely, that employees offer up different degrees and dimensions of their selves according to some internal calculus that they consciously and unconsciously make (Kahn, 1990). Traditional motivation studies implicitly assumed that workers were either on or they were off; that is, based on external rewards and intrinsic factors, they were either motivated to work or not, and that this was a relatively steady state that they...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information