The International Handbook on Private Enforcement of Competition Law

The International Handbook on Private Enforcement of Competition Law

Elgar original reference

Edited by Albert A. Foer and Jonathan W. Cuneo

With the international community on the brink of an explosion of private remedies for violation of national competition laws, this timely Handbook provides state-of-the-art analysis of the private enforcement of competition laws across the globe. Private enforcement of antitrust is becoming a significant component of competition policy laws worldwide; today, more than a hundred jurisdictions have adopted market regimes operating within a framework of competition law, providing a varied base for developing ways by which persons injured by anticompetitive conduct will (or will not) be able to obtain remedies.

Chapter 3: Differing Traditions

Jonathan W. Cuneo

Subjects: law - academic, competition and antitrust law, law -professional, competition and antitrust law


Jonathan W. Cuneo1 Private antitrust enforcement consists of two components: first, a competition law with one or more cognizable offenses; and second, a viable means for private parties to redress those offenses. As this Handbook illustrates, it is surely possible to have the first without the second. The United States is historically the center of gravity for both components – antitrust and private rights of action. Even before the sea change in America’s trading partners’ views of the antitrust laws, foreign interests,2 including some from Latin America,3 pursued claims in American courts under the antitrust laws because the United States was the best – if not the only – place to turn to seek legal redress. So American are the fundamental concepts that both ‘trusts’ and ‘antitrust’ are American contributions to the English lexicon. In this context, ‘trust’ is a nineteenth century term that refers to large agglomerations of economic power under common control. Since passage of the first antitrust act – the Sherman Act in 1890 – the United States has made an at least lip-service commitment to a national policy of free and open competition. Enforcement of national policies through high-stakes private litigation which carefully balances the rights of aggrieved parties against the due process rights of defendants is also a venerable American tradition. This evenhanded tradition, which includes an independent Federal judiciary, makes large scale litigation possible. The Congressional decision to afford plaintiffs’ treble damages and attorneys’ fees, as well as joint and several liability and the class device, make...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information