The International Handbook on Private Enforcement of Competition Law

The International Handbook on Private Enforcement of Competition Law

Elgar original reference

Edited by Albert A. Foer and Jonathan W. Cuneo

With the international community on the brink of an explosion of private remedies for violation of national competition laws, this timely Handbook provides state-of-the-art analysis of the private enforcement of competition laws across the globe. Private enforcement of antitrust is becoming a significant component of competition policy laws worldwide; today, more than a hundred jurisdictions have adopted market regimes operating within a framework of competition law, providing a varied base for developing ways by which persons injured by anticompetitive conduct will (or will not) be able to obtain remedies.

Chapter 23: Turkey

Hilmi Bolatoglu

Subjects: law - academic, competition and antitrust law, law -professional, competition and antitrust law


Hilmi Bolatoglu1 Introduction Turkey utilizes a dual system of administrative and private antitrust enforcement. Although the Turkish Competition Authority (TCA), a government agency established pursuant to The Act on the Protection of Competition2 (Competition Act), plays a central role in this dual system, private actions for damages also have very strong statutory roots which make private enforcement potentially important for Turkish competition law. Provisions regarding damages actions in the Competition Act depart from the general rules of the Code of Obligations both in proving injury and in calculating damages.3 Competition infringements may be classified as a new and unique statutory cause of action other than those codified in the Code of Obligations.4 Provisions concerning substantive issues such as restrictive agreements, abuse of dominant position and merger control in the Competition Act are adapted from the competition law area of the acquis communautaire5 of the European Community (EC).6 However, the Turkish Parliament has followed the US example in damages actions, explicitly codifying rules similar to those found in the Clayton Act. Interestingly, this adaptation includes relief in the form of treble damages,7 a concept not previously recognized in Turkish liability law.8 As the EC law does not have Community-wide legal provisions governing damages in private actions, adaptation of the US approach might be regarded as a significant contribution to the effectiveness of private enforcement. Thus, the Competition Act seems divided between the EC and US approaches. This dichotomy 1 Competition Expert & Legal Counsel, Turkish Competition Authority; LL.M. University of...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information