Table of Contents

Competition Policy and the Economic Approach

Competition Policy and the Economic Approach

Foundations and Limitations

Edited by Josef Drexl, Wolfgang Kerber and Rupprecht Podszun

This outstanding collection of original essays brings together some of the leading experts in competition economics, policy and law. They examine what lies at the core of the ‘economic approach to competition law’ and deal with its normative and institutional limitations. In recent years the ‘more economic approach’ has led to a modernisation of competition law throughout the world. This book comprehensively examines for the first time, the foundations and limitations of the approach and will be of great interest to scholars of competition policy no matter what discipline.

Chapter 5: Using Economics for Identifying Anticompetitive Unilateral Practices

Michele Polo

Subjects: economics and finance, competition policy, law - academic, competition and antitrust law


Michele Polo* 1. INTRODUCTION The debate on competition policy among practitioners as well as academics has focussed in recent years on unilateral practices by dominant firms. Important cases such as the US and European Microsoft ones, the Intel case, the several cases on price squeeze that have involved most of the European telecom incumbents have highlighted the importance of this area of antitrust enforcement. Having completed important reforms on Article 101 TFEU and merger control in the first years of the decade, in 2004 the DG Competition moved to reshaping the enforcement of Article 102 TFEU (ex-Article 82 EC), pursuing an approach that rests on a deeper and intelligent use of the new findings of economic analysis in the enforcement against unilateral practices. In 2005 a first set of documents was proposed, with the report drafted by a group of economic advisors of the Chief Economist and the discussion paper by the officers. The two papers share a common approach that has been labelled as ‘effect-based’ or ‘more economic’ as opposed to the traditional form-based approach, although they differ in some cases in the way this view can be translated into specific guidelines and practices. The novelty of these proposals refers to the need to identify anticompetitive practices through a careful inspection of the specific situations and of the foreclosure effects of the practices, beyond their formal description (Gual et al. 2005, DG Competition 2005). The discussion has addressed both the methodological issues and the specific elements of the practices...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information