Environmental Politics and Deliberative Democracy

Environmental Politics and Deliberative Democracy

Examining the Promise of New Modes of Governance

Edited by Karin Bäckstrand, Jamil Kahn, Annica Kronsell and Eva Lövbrand

Can new modes of governance, such as public–private partnerships, stakeholder consultations and networks, promote effective environmental policy performance as well as increased deliberative and participatory quality? This book argues that in academic inquiry and policy practice there has been a deliberative turn, manifested in a revitalized interest in deliberative democracy coupled with calls for novel forms of public–private governance. By linking theory and practice, the contributors critically examine the legitimacy and effectiveness of new modes of governance, using a range of case studies on climate, forestry, water and food safety policies from local to global levels.

Chapter 4: Weberian Climate Policy: Administrative Rationality Organized as a Market

Johannes Stripple

Subjects: environment, environmental governance and regulation, environmental politics and policy, politics and public policy, environmental politics and policy, european politics and policy


Johannes Stripple INTRODUCTION1 When the Kyoto Protocol2 to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) was agreed upon in 1997, most commentaries revolved around whether the agreed mandatory reductions of greenhouse gases (around 5 per cent in the rich world) should be considered a failure or a success. Very few framed the importance of the Kyoto Protocol as a crucial moment in the marketization of climate governance, as an experiment in a particular mode of governance. The Kyoto Protocol attempts to create markets in emission reductions in various ways. These markets assign a monetary value to emissions and thereby hope to channel clean energy investments around the world. While contemporary environmental policy jargon is littered with notions of certain instruments being ‘innovative’, or ‘new’, these labels are actually quite appropriate when its comes to the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) of the Kyoto Protocol. The CDM can be understood as a response to the trilemma illustrated by Figure 1.1 in Chapter 1. With its broad encouragement of business and civil society, its delegation of authority from public to private actors and its enabling of market forms of governance, the CDM epitomizes the promise of new modes of governance. This chapter is written at a time when the future state of carbon markets is unclear. The Kyoto Protocol’s first commitment period expires in 2012, and the role and relevance of market-based governance in any post-2012 agreement still needs to be decided upon. Since it took four years, from Kyoto (1997)...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information