Table of Contents

Handbook of Research on Mergers and Acquisitions

Handbook of Research on Mergers and Acquisitions

Elgar original reference

Edited by Yaakov Weber

For the last four decades, researchers in various disciplines have been trying to explain the enduring paradox of the growing activity and volume of mergers and acquisitions (M & A) versus the high failure rate of M & A. This Handbook will stimulate scholars to focus on new research directions.

Chapter 8: Individual values and organizational culture during a merger: immovable objects or shifting sands?

Marie H. Kavanagh and Neal M. Ashkanasy

Subjects: business and management, corporate governance, organisational behaviour, strategic management, economics and finance, corporate governance


Mergers and acquisitions continue to be a popular model for organizational growth but, as Cartwright and Schoenberg (2006) note, often with mixed success. In this respect, scholars (for example, Korman et al. 1978; Cartwright and Cooper 1992; Sagiv and Schwartz 1995; Weber 1996, 2000) have acknowledged the role human factors play in determining the success or otherwise of mergers. In line with Cartwright and Cooper (1996), we argue that whether or not individuals view the merger as presenting a threat, providing an opportunity or having little (or no) impact on future working life will depend on the proposed direction and clarity of future change, acceptability of the change, and the values held by the individuals affected. Moreover, as Major (2000) suggested, organizational culture is the active critical ingredient of mergers (Cartwright and Cooper 1992, 1996; Ashkanasy and Holmes 1995; Weber 2000). As such, the individual becomes merely a ‘thing’ to be brought into the organization. This view had led to ambivalence about the role of individuals (Ashkanasy et al. 2000b, 2011) and the importance of individual values when leading change (Kavanagh and Ashkanasy 1996). Weber and Drori (2008) suggest further that most research about human factors in mergers has been prescriptive and atheoretical; and note the role of the individual, especially in cases affected by cultural difference, has rarely been investigated empirically.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information